• Contributors
  • Articles
  • Podcast
  • Guides
  • Courses
  • Research
  • Introduction To Zwemer
  • Give
  • Partners
Ad for  Columbia International University

Zwemer Center

  • Introduction To Zwemer
  • Give
  • Partners
  • Contributors
  • Articles
  • Podcast
  • Guides
  • Courses
  • Research
Play Audio
https://www.zwemercenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Online-Course-Ben-Affleck.mp3
Category •

Response to Sam Harris and Bill Maher

Dr. Trevor Castor
https://www.zwemercenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Online-Course-Ben-Affleck.mp3

Related Articles

Zionism and American Evangelicals
Colin Chapman

Short

Zionism and American Evangelicals

It’s estimated that there are anything between 50 and 80 million evangelical Christians in the USA who enthusiastically support the state of Israel…


Full
ISIS: Un-Islamic or True Islam?
Colin Chapman

Short

ISIS: Un-Islamic or True Islam?

There are typically two responses to ISIS. ‘ISIS has nothing to do with Islam’ or ‘ISIS are the real Muslims’. It’s easy to understand why so many Muslims—especially in western contexts—dissociate themselves from ISIS. They are thoroughly embarrassed to think that non-Muslims around them might assume that because they are Muslims, they must have some sympathy with ISIS and all that it is doing. They therefore argue that many of the practices of ISIS are completely un-Islamic, even anti-Islamic and cannot be justified by the legal traditions that have been developed over many centuries.

At the other extreme there are many Christians—and, dare I say, especially evangelical Christians—who believe that ISIS is much nearer to the spirit and practice of early Islam than moderate Muslims of today. They point to particular verses in the Qur’an (e.g. about beheading, crucifixion and slavery) and passages in Hadith literature, the biographies of Muhammad and legal texts to show the connections between the brutalities of ISIS and early Islamic texts.

Both of these approaches are thoroughly unhelpful and need to be challenged.


Full
Why the Polarization Concerning Islam and Violence?
Carter Smith

Short

Why the Polarization Concerning Islam and Violence?

Few questions regarding Islam are as salient to current events and public discourse as the relationship between Islam and violence, and few questions are as polarizing. Outsiders looking into the house of Islam have reached conflicting conclusions, with American Presidents defending “the religion of peace” while others connect acts of terrorism and violence directly to “the traditional, orthodox, and classical version of Islam…”


Full
Book Review: A Wind in the House of Islam
Phil Davis

Short

Book Review: A Wind in the House of Islam

In his book, “A Wind in the House of Islam,” David Garrison seeks to understand and describe the people movements to Christ that are increasingly taking place throughout the Muslim world (6). According to Garrison, eighty-four percent of all the movements to Christ – defined as at least one thousand new believers or one hundred new churches within two decades (230) – have taken place in the 21st century (226). Though Garrison admits that these movements represent a very small, “statistically almost insignificant” fraction of the Muslim world, he sees this recent development as a potential “hinge moment in history” (232) that may lead to the “Day of Salvation for Muslims” (252). In response to this new move of God in the Muslim world, Garrison aims to ascertain how God is bringing Muslims to faith in Christ (24). He hopes his study will equip the church to better participate in what God is doing, encourage Muslim converts, and inspire Christians to become more engaged in Muslim outreach (41). In this paper, I will review this important study by briefly summarizing its contents and then seeking to assess its strengths and weaknesses in accomplishing Garrison’s aims.


Full

Navigation:

  • Contributors
  • Articles
  • Podcast
  • Guides
  • Courses
  • Research

Keep Current:

Sign up for weekly email updates

In Partnership With: